
I sometimes think the differences between Muslims and Christians are not too many, but are very significant. It’s like a chasm you think you could jump across, although wide enough to be a little scary. But if you don’t make it to the other side, the fall down the crevasse is way farther than you’d like.
On this Good Friday, I suppose most Muslim Connect readers are thinking of the crucifixion. And that’s where we find the chasm-deep division between us and our Abrahamic cousins. The Quran portrays Jesus as a prophet and a good guy, but someone who probably didn’t die.
Divine? Nope.
Crucified? Close, but not quite.
Resurrection? Not needed. Didn’t die.
You might be surprised to learn the beginning of Muslims’ “Jesus-didn’t-die-on-the-cross” conviction rests unsteadily on just one verse of the Quran. Here’s the verse, “That they said (in boast), ‘We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah’; – but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.” Q4:157
As Gregory Lanier brilliantly unfolds, that verse is probably talking more about the Jews looking bad than about Jesus dying or not. At the very least, the exegesis is tricky, the idea is mentioned only once in the Quran and it only shows up lightly in the Shia (not Sunni) Hadith.
The alternative idea that Jesus was swept up to Heaven supports both Shia and Sunni eschatology. Denying the crucifixion makes the Resurrection a moot point, which serves your case when you want to view Jesus as just a guy, a really good guy.
But if he was crucified. . . and he did rise from that death. Well now, that changes everything, doesn’t it?








